Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 9(Supplement 2):S199, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2189617

ABSTRACT

Background. Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a low incidence of cardiovascular complications was reported amongst hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in Singapore. Little was known about the trend of cardiovascular complications as the pandemic progressed. As such, we sought to examine the evolving trends in electrocardiographic and cardiovascular manifestations in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection. Methods. We examined the first 1781 consecutive hospitalised patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed COVID-19 in a tertiary academic centre. We divided the population based on those who had an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) and those who had a normal ECG, comparing the baseline characteristics and outcomes between the 2 groups. Cardiovascular complications such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis and mortality were also examined over time. Results. Of the 261 (14.7%) patients presenting with abnormal ECG, they were more likely to be symptomatic with complaints of breathlessness, palpitations and chest pain. Sinus tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia. Troponin I levels (41.6+/-264.3 vs 97.0+/-482.9, p=0.047) and C-reactive protein levels (20.1+/-50.7 vs 13.9+/-24.1 mumol/L, p=0.003) were significantly higher amongst those with abnormal ECGs at presentation, with a higher prevalence of myocarditis (1.9% vs 0.5%, p=0.021), pulmonary embolism (1.9% vs 0.3%, p=0.009) and acute myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 0.1%, p=0.025). Over time, there was a trend towards a higher proportion of hospitalised patients with cardiovascular complications. Baseline characteristics of hospitalised patients with COVID-19, with or without abnormal ECG at presentation Changes in percentage of hospitalised patients with COVID-19, experiencing cardiovascular events (acute myocardial infarction, stroke, myocarditis, pulmonary embolism and death) over time Conclusion. A baseline ECG at presentation is a simple test that provides valuable information on potential cardiovascular complications in the context of COVID-19. Although the prevalence of abnormal ECGs is relatively low, it appears to be increasing over time amongst hospitalised patients with COVID-19.

5.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 41(8): 1220-1224, 2020 Aug 10.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-739002

ABSTRACT

Objective: To understand the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 monitoring cases in Yinzhou district based on health big data platform to provide evidence for the construction of COVID-19 monitoring system. Methods: Data on Yinzhou COVID-19 daily surveillance were collected. Information on patients' population classification, epidemiological history, COVID-19 nucleic acid detection rate, positive detection rate and confirmed cases monitoring detection rate were analyzed. Results: Among the 1 595 COVID-19 monitoring cases, 79.94% were community population and 20.06% were key population. The verification rate of monitoring cases was 100.00%. The total percentage of epidemiological history related to Wuhan city or Hubei province was 6.27% in total, and was 2.12% in community population and 22.81% in key population (P<0.001). The total COVID-19 nucleic acid detection rate was 18.24% (291/1 595), and 53.00% in those with epidemiological history and 15.92% in those without (P<0.001).The total positive detection rate was 1.72% (5/291) and the confirmed cases monitoring detection rate was 0.31% (5/1 595). The time interval from the first visit to the first nucleic acid detection of the confirmed monitoring cases and other confirmed cases was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Conclusions: The monitoring system of COVID-19 based on the health big data platform was working well but the confirmed cases monitoring detection rate need to be improved.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Big Data , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Cities , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Pandemics , Population Surveillance , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Toxicol Commun ; 4(1): 40-42, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-405356

ABSTRACT

The media have featured the antimalarials chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat coronavirus (COVID-19). Political leaders have touted their use and recommended availability to the public. These anti-inflammatory agents have substantial human toxicity with a narrow therapeutic window. CQ and HCQ poisoning cause myocardial depression and profound hypotension due to vasodilation. Bradycardia and ventricular escape rhythms arise from impaired myocardial automaticity and conductivity due to sodium and potassium channel blockade. With cardiotoxicity, ECGs may show widened QRS, atrioventricular heart block and QT interval prolongation. CQ may also cause seizures, often refractory to standard treatment. Of concern is pediatric poisoning, where 1-2 pills of CQ or HCQ can cause serious and potentially fatal toxicity in a toddler. The treatment of CQ/HCQ poisoning includes high-dose intravenous diazepam postulated to have positive ionotropic and antidysrhythmic properties that may antagonize the cardiotoxic effects of CQ. Infusions of epinephrine titrated to treat unstable hypotension, as well as potassium for severe hypokalemia may be required. Current scientific evidence does not support treatment or prophylactic use of these agents for COVID-19 disease. Regulatory and public health authorities recognize that CQ/HCQ may offer little clinical benefit and only add risk requiring further investigation before wider public distribution.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL